A question about the Holy Grail that medieval writers asked, "do not use?" Well, let's take a look at the real world Grail and see if it is not for us or are we serving?
Very briefly and for those of us who have been on the planet health in recent years, the Da Vinci Code is a novel about a man who reveals a code that is not the true identity of the Holy Grail to be further identified as the very basis of bloodline Jesus Christ andMaria Magdalena.
Unfortunately, the author, Dan Brown, claimed his now famous book based on real events, organizations and events. This could not be further from the truth.
Priory of Sion
This supposedly ancient and enigmatic group allegedly once Leonardo da Vinci as Grand Master, not to mention Nicolas Flamel and Isaac Newton. However, there is no truth in him. Sion was the name of a mountain near the residences of Pierre Plantard and straightde Sede - two of the original creators of the Priory of Sion hoax.
The documents of the Priory in the National Library in Paris were false evidence. In fact, the only copies of anything for Mr Plantard in the Paris Library are newsletters from 1950 for an apartment cooperatives rather boring, complain the state of roads, and this is very bad French.
All the instigators of this surrealist hoax have admitted theirCreation of records. First, they said it was a surrealist joke and the other a kind of egotistical ploy to be accepted by society.
Sang Real
One of the most important pieces evidence for books on the bloodline of Christ's Holy Blood, Holy Grail to the revelation of the Templars was the interpretation of the original name of the Holy Grail - Holy Grail. In the 80s book Holy Blood, Holy Grail by Michael Baigent et al, we interpret them differently,Release of G from the end of the San Graal, who sang real. This then translates as royal or holy. Confusion of a simple mistake by a writer of the 15th Century - the only time the mistake was made until 1980 - an entire theory is based on something that is simply not true. Sir Walter Skeat, one of the greatest etymologists England has ever created, but said a hundred years ago that this error was' forged very soon "and for what purpose did not know. He pointed out that in realitythe original concept meant bowl, which of course refers only to the theory that I presented in the queue Grail.
Leonardo da Vinci
So now we know the true etymology of the Holy Grail and the Priory of Sion, in fact, never were, we should also know that Leonardo is not a grand master of an existing order that no secret that there have not been well protected.
Actually, shows all historical data and information on Leonardo who had askilled artist and wonderful - so great revelation there then.
However, there are these strange elements of his images that embrace the "Da Vinci Code and others. Take the female looking for the Lord's Supper, for example. Many have greatly the fact that this person seems stressed women. Well, he does. Other than the Mona Lisa does not have quite enough women and showed that the subject was definitely a boy. With these assumptions, manyargues that Leonardo was so gay. It 's always more fun every day, how far this rubber band can be stretched before he comes back and hits someone who rushes to his face.
So what is the truth? Is that a lady in the Lord's Supper? No.
There was a tradition of painting the disciple that Christ loved, John the Evangelist, as something childish detail what questions to help the minds of many, as if Jesus himself was gay. In fact, I found thisbe part of an ancient Gnostic tradition in which the two Johns, John the Baptist and John the Evangelist, two sides of the duality - male and female, positive and negative, which then needed "to complete. So John the Evangelist was perceived as the feminine principle in this sense, while John the Baptist was the manly bearded wild figure.
It was also a hidden part of the tradition of the painter's guild of the time include androgynous elementsin their paintings for this reason. This androgynous element is shown here as a symbol of the union of opposites already, man and woman, male and female, both sides of our mind, which must reunite the perfect human form.
Perhaps Jesus and Mary to marry and have children?
To answer this question we must reduce it.
First, if Jesus married Mary Magdalene then we must admit that Jesus and Mary were first.Although we have a lot of characters to textual evidence of this Bible, this is due to the enormous amount of copy by hundreds of years after the fact in question. We have not tested real name or character of the time, most of the texts date hundreds of years.
Even assuming that these people really were, we should admit that Jesus walked on water, cast out demons into pigs and die and rise again. That, or weAnother option: the character of Jesus, like Robin Hood and King Arthur was a real man somewhere and all the basic elements of mythical and mystical extras were added to the story. Just as Robin married Marion (Mary) married Arthur and Guinevere, so too in this way - that is mythical - Jesus may have married Mary - although there is no textual evidence for this.
Both Marion and Mary are the same and imply water and wisdom. Guinevere comes from similar rootsespecially as the Queen of Heaven, a title for Mary the Mother of Jesus and Isis was the mother of Horus, as many scholars have pointed out the two Mary's may in fact be a myth incorporations much older.
Geneva is also the "king of serpents' and therefore knowledge and wisdom, and his name is the etymology of Eve which means female serpent in the report and is a sign of wisdom.
Just as the first Christian church was the formation of groups like the Gnostics or OphitesSnake worshipers, making their communion cup of the snake well, were also split the triple mother goddess - Mary - in different places. First the Mother Mary, then her sister Mary and then Mary Magdalene, a mysterious element and we'll see why.
Mary, the mother is the mother of Isis, Horus. As Horus is the son and in fact the reincarnation of Osiris, Isis, or Mary is so her sister and lover. This is all three, the feminine trinity. Mary Magdalene is, therefore, the hiddenLovers of Jesus, God and the Son of God, is like Horus, Sun and all this mystery tradition relates to the ancient serpent cult as Isis, Osiris and Horus strong associations with the creative, wise and immortal serpent had. The same feminine trinity can in fact be found and even India with Kali in Celtic myth.
Jesus was then compared to the Mosaic "brazen serpent in the desert and photographed hundreds of times, like a snake on the cross. Here we have thatparallel with Arthur, whose name, Pendragon, means "snake head" or "snake head".
Now we can see only these few examples, are in a real code. An ancient code going back to ancient Egypt and also known by Isis and Osiris and Enki in Sumer and Ninkhursag and Mesopotamia, which was to be a serpent priests or doctors.
But what is this code telling us?
Simply in order that the birth of our Messiah's anointing or commission orto save us, in union with the wisdom that is symbolized as water and the serpent - hence Arthur Pendragon and his wife, the queen of snakes, or were in the early Enki and Ninkhursag, serpent deities or Shining Ones and are symbols of enlightenment.
When God was upon the face of deep waters in Genesis, so must we submerge in wisdom, in order to realize the divine creation within us.
So now we understand that Jesus andMary in union could be a metaphor or a copy of the old system, what's left?
The Da Vinci Code truth is, in fact, know more than real people. Jesus and Mary were married in the Gnostic sense and not in the literal sense. It must produce a child, and was known simply as Gnosis. But the evil twin brother known as Catholicism tried to wipe out, as Set tried to destroy Osiris, or Mordred killed Arthur or the Sheriff of Nottingham killed Robin. At the end of the set,Mordred and the Sheriff were reversed, what will be the opinion of the Catholic Church?
The truth behind the veil of the literal Christianity hides the real truth of the Holy Grail, which is like alchemy, work on them. The question now is who do not need?
Well, one thing we know that organizations in the Da Vinci Code, like the Jesuits and Opus Dei have spoken, but tried to keep this self empowering truth of humanity. The reasonfor this is simple, with the knowledge of our god-head we no longer need a priest or a church, and I know They lose wealth and power. Let's take a look at some of these organizations and see what were up a.
The Society of Jesus or Jesuits was founded in 1540 by St. Ignatius of Loyola, and has since grown from the original seven to nearly 30,000 members who work for nearly 2,000 homes in 100 countries. According to J. Parnell McCarter in his Puritan News Service,Ignatius was himself a Gnostic Enlightenment - a member of Alumbrados of Spain, his homeland. This Alumbrados were simply the Spanish version of the infamous Illuminati - bringing full circle the Jesuits created by lighting and then going to create the Illuminati. All this was at the same time the increase in Freemasonic thought occurring.
What is known about Ignatius is that he is a soldier of the Spanish Basque Country experienced an extraordinary transformation was therefore presumably duringis recovering from a broken leg. His experiences were written down and called them Spiritual Exercises, and later the Society of Jesus or Jesuits was conducted with the approval of Pope Paul III in 1540. Strange, for the printing of his Spiritual Exercises in 1548 was brought before the Inquisition, but was later released.
According to the Catholic Church of the Jesuits for their holiness, became famous, which basically means that many members had blessed or saint.Participated in many scientific discoveries and the exploration and exploitation of the New World.
From the start the Pope was overwhelmed with the Jesuit Service for its secret police, a folder of background information and bully-boys, much like the history of Alumbrados (Verklärten.) At first sight it the Jesuits were opening schools , making amazing discoveries and sending missionaries from around the world. In fact, says CatholicChurch, that no order has never been martyrs. Molding a culture or pagan religion often brings dangers and martyrdom.
The skill of Ignatius Loyola was in the Assembly to him by an energetic band of well-educated and determined men. Ignatius had the concept should manage the care of the Church with missionaries such as Francis Xavier, who preached and the sacraments, and church membership is growing and collecting large amounts of information.
Ignatius soonfound that colleges and universities offered the greatest service to manipulate the Church, for entirely religious education, the Jesuits could manipulate the thinkers in addition to the masses in the church on Sunday.
In 1773 Pope Clement XIV yielded to Bourbon pressure and reduces the power of the Jesuits on the surface. The Jesuits followed orders and disbanded temporarily until 1814 when they brought back together. Like the Templar before them theJesuits simply assumed other roles. As if to prove that the Jesuits were ultimately obedient to the Pope in 1590 Pope Sixtus V wanted, so the name of Jesus from the official name of the company, the Jesuits duly complied - although Sixtus then surprisingly died - the questions arise, 's killed him and it does really show obedience to the Pope?
Today the Jesuits are back in force, with schools, colleges and universities around the world. At any time you are educatingover half a million people. Ex-President Mitterrand in France was a Jesuit, and it was he who initiated the infamous pyramid of light in the Louvre in Paris.
There is a subtle background running under the cover of this Catholic order - is a stream of light now bastardised as a secret truth and hidden from our eyes with his clever manipulation of religion for the masses. But they also have links with business and politics.
Bilderberg
The modernDay of the elite group in power on an international basis, the two heads are accused behind a new world order was. On the other hand, are said to be saying that the Bilderberg group is simply a meeting of leaders-in order to discuss freely and easily to the concerns of world leaders.
What is clear from the meeting came from two other groups also conspiracy theorist simple statement - that the Trilateral Commission and the Council on ForeignRelations.
"One of the most important institutions, has fostered unity and cooperation with the Atlantic Community beyond the old concepts, the Bilderberg Group." Bilderberg: The Cold War International, 1971, Gilbert and Carl Eugen Pasymowski.
The origins of this group rest with a man, Joseph Retinger, a Catholic who had links with the Society of Jesus, we are only seen in the background manipulated for centuries. He also recommended that the turning point of Hungary, Austria andPoland into a tripartite state under the guidance of 'Order of the Jesuits. The plan was abandoned.
"I remember Retinger United States Record on the phone and immediately makes an appointment with the President, and in Europe he had complete entrée in every political circle as a kind of right acquired through trust, devotion and loyalty he inspired." Sir Edward Bedington-Behrens.
A good war record Retinger was certainly involved in secret and undergroundWorks, even parachuting into occupied Germany at the age of 58 years.
He found the European Movement, the rise of the Council of Europe in 1949, which established in Strasbourg, where he worked Retinger.
Retinger believed in unity and to that end is not really important as the drive has been caused. He certainly involved big business and the influence that within the general public - we were created after all tied to our television screens and led by marketingMen.
The inclusion of Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, began his crusade Retinger you to be in America, which he believed essential to world peace. "The Prince has an important position in Royal Dutch Petroleum and Shell, and participated in several international companies, and had such an influence, which is consistent with the Americans and others.
In 1952 it was proposed by Retinger should be open and honest discussion between the various organizations and individualsthat controlled the world. This should allow participation in secret, to express their opinion without worrying that appear in newspapers the next day will be.
This was the birth of the Bilderberg Group, after the hotel in Oosterbeek, where the meetings were held in May 1954 he was appointed.
"In short, Bilderberg is a proven, flexible and informal international leadership forum, may be placed on the various views and enhance mutual understanding."1989 Bilderberg Meeting
Well, who does what you want, but before we close, we should be involved to take a quick look at Opus Dei, another of the groups of Dan Brown.
Opus Dei means simply the "work of God," and although she is not entitled to a sect because their authority comes from the Catholic Church, they act as one.
I found in my personal research that Opus Dei, in fact, were more than incidental within the Franco regime and in fact contributed to the financialOrganization of the political regime of the application. It 'been members of Opus Dei, the leaders of the Ministries of Finance so that some of them Spanish writer, the Spaniards were called Mafia. And today, in almost every country in the Western world, Catholic or not, there are members of Opus Dei in positions of incredible political power. In England, Opus Dei is, many women and is recruited from those actually in government. Ruth Kelly is the UK Secretary of State for Educationand was shut down, along with his brother, Dr Ronan Kelly, University of Oxford. So even if a woman is "allowed" to be in government, is in turn regulated by the male-dominated Catholic Opus Dei - a society where you can get has never prevailed on a man and a boy has the dogma and doctrine a follow-dominated religion. Your beliefs are governed by the Church men, and thus their decisions, the power is coming under the control of their male masters of Opus Dei.
AIndicating the type of control is the founder of Opus Day Book Josemaria Escriva's The Way:
"You do not buy books without the advice of an experienced Christian. It 's so easy to buy something useless or harmful. Often people believe they are with a book under his arm ... but only carry a load of mud. "(Josemaria Escriva, The Way, P339)
This is obviously in control, so that the admission of a book to the orthodoxy is no better than a ban. Partof 'childhood before Opus ", whereby members of their own will have to sacrifice the work of God, faith in the leaders with their soul. After some ex-members that control extends as far as their mail private law in order to censor material wicked. In another way I will now drag their censors, because all that is "fair game criticism." There's a little surprise in this kind of fascism exists in their teaching If we consider that theywere created in 1928 at the dawn of Italian Fascism.
So all I can say is, beware of this group, there is a control too much of your life and to want what you think. They are also skill points to spread their network as follows:
Ally with the guardian of the person you want to win for your apostolate - He is always a good accomplice''. P563
There is little difference here, collect the way secret societies and intelligence agencies and their flock. This can be seen inThe following statements from The Way (P643 and 655):
"Not the secrets of your apostolate" and
"I can not stop on the importance of Tell 'discretion." Perhaps it is the tip of the weapon, but at least is the deal with him. "
Since they are very concerned about the fact that they collect rich and intelligent individuals who open their case, arguing that to do this good shepherd. The same goes for intelligence agencies that collect and universitiesand universities to choose their prospective members.
So what is the truth? Is the Catholic Church have their tentacles all over the world? Are the center of a vast network of control? I have said on many occasions - if you want to win a football game, then hold both teams. This is a capability that humanity has been used for centuries for both parties. Historical experience shows that the Jesuit order, and now Opus Dei in the middle of the growth of wealth in the centerpower and control. What we need to understand that our religious leaders are not always for the love of God? And who is this statement "nonsense bloodline? Who owns Team Brown?
No comments:
Post a Comment